Post-August 2025 PTE updates changed the game with new tasks, hybrid scoring, and more focus on content. Based on 50 real student score reports, this analysis reveals the truth behind perceptions — why Reading is now the toughest section, how Speaking surprised everyone, and what students and trainers must do to adapt.
Hey — if you’re prepping for PTE or coaching students right now, this one’s written for you. I analysed 50 student score reports (post-August 7, 2025 changes) and combined that with on-the-ground feedback to separate the rumours from what actually happened. Below you’ll find plain talk, quick tips, and clear takeaways you can act on today.
Introduction — what changed and why this matters
Quick recap: on 7 August 2025 Pearson rolled out major updates — two new speaking tasks (Summarize Group Discussion and Respond to a Situation), longer test time (~2h15m), a hybrid AI-plus-human scoring model and increase in content scores for several key tasks (Describe Image, Retell Lecture, Essay, Summarize Written Text and others). These changes shifted emphasis from formulaic templates to content relevance and originality.
Why this matters: students and institutes now need to focus on real communicative ability — not only tricks. That affects preparation time, attempt planning and even immigration scores for some countries. The dataset used here: 50 student results analysed across all four skills.
Perception vs Reality — quick side-by-side
Students and trainers had a lot of expectations after August. Let’s put a few common beliefs next to what the 50-student data actually shows.
What students & institutes expected
“Templates will completely banned.”
“Speaking will become much harder across the board.”
“Writing will fall sharply because of human review.”
“Reading stays easy — just manage time.”
What the 50-student data shows
Modified templates work
Speaking performed better than expected for most students.
Writing and Listening showed moderate impact.
Reading turned out to be the most difficult section.
Section-by-Section Reality Check
Speaking: The Pleasant Surprise
You might want to sit down for this one. Despite all the human review hysteria, Speaking has the highest success rate:
· 42% of students achieve 79+ scores (visa requirement)
· 28% achieve perfect 90 scores
· Zero students severely underperformed (more than 10 points below overall)
What's working: Students who adapted their templates with genuine content are actually succeeding. The human reviewers seem to care more about content relevance than perfect grammar.
Pro Tip: The new "Respond to a Situation" task is still tricky, but it's not the score-killer everyone feared. Practice spontaneous responses for 30 seconds – that's your sweet spot.
Reading: The Unexpected Challenge
Here's where things get tough. Reading has become the section that's making or breaking students' dreams:
· Only 4% achieve 79+ scores (lowest among all sections)
· 26% score below 60 (highest struggle rate)
· No student achieved a perfect 90 in our sample
What's happening: The increased number of questions is creating serious time pressure. Students who used to breeze through Reading are now running out of time.
Reality Check: If you're struggling with Reading, you're not alone – it's now officially the hardest section.
Writing: The Middle Ground
Writing is playing out exactly as expected – challenging but manageable:
· 20% achieve 79+ scores (moderate success rate)
· Only 2% achieve perfect scores
· Content relevance matters more than ever
Template Truth: Generic essay templates are dead, but structured approaches with original content still work. Think of templates as your skeleton – you need to add real meat to them.
Listening: The Correlation King
Here's something interesting – Listening has the strongest relationship with overall success (0.872 correlation):
· 30% achieve 79+ scores
· Wide performance range (49-90 points)
· Best predictor of overall performance
Strategic Insight: Strong Listening skills seem to boost performance across all sections. Focus here if you want maximum impact.
Score Distribution: The Visual Truth
Score distribution showing percentage of students achieving different score ranges across PTE Academic sections
This chart tells the whole story. Look how Speaking dominates the high-score ranges while Reading struggles at the bottom. It's completely opposite to what everyone predicted!
Common Pain Areas: What's Really Hurting Students
Top recurring issues
Reading overload — increased number of questions creates time and cognitive load; many students ran out of time or lost accuracy. 28% of students score significantly below their overall performance in Reading
Template detection + content scoring — Describe Image, Retell Lecture, Essay, Summarize tasks face human review and expanded content scoring; recycled templates get flagged.
Time & endurance — extra ~15 minutes modestly helps, but overall mental fatigue increased for late-exam sections (Listening).
Section-specific challenges
Reading — The most difficult section
Lowest average, highest percent below 60, and very few 80+ scores. The expanded question set is the main cause. If you’re weak in Reading, it drags your overall down.
Speaking — paradoxical high performance
Despite fears, many students scored very well (lots of 90s). Why? Some students adapted templates into frameworks and focused on content originality, or human review may be moderating rather than harshly punitive. Still: don’t rely on templates alone.
Writing — content scrutiny
Essays now scored on 0–6 content, linguistic range and content, structure & development scale (up from smaller ranges), so structure + originality + development matter. Generic essays lose points.
Listening — variable but predictive
Wide score spread — but strong correlation with Overall. Good listening practice tends to lift total scores.
High-variability students — who to watch
About 14% (7 students) showed extreme variability (~25+ point gap between sections). Typical profile: very high Speaking and low Reading — indicating prior template reliance for speaking plus poor reading endurance. These students often need targeted, section-by-section rehabilitation rather than generic practice.
Sample cases
L68 R52 S90 W66 (Overall 71) — 38 points gap in Speaking and Reading scores.
These show the exact adaptation problems trainers must fix.
Actionable Takeaways — what to do now
For students — practical, real steps
Prioritise Reading — put ~40% of your study time on Reading practice because it’s the single biggest drag on scores right now. Practice speed reading with PTE-specific question formats. Set strict time limits for each question type.
Use templates only as structure — open templates into flexible frames; always add original content. Don’t memorize whole scripts.
Practice new tasks daily — Summarize Group Discussion and Respond to Situation need spontaneity; simulate real 2-minute summaries and 40-second situational replies.
Train endurance — do full-length timed mocks to reduce late-section fatigue.
Focus on content relevance — especially for Describe Image, Retell Lecture, and essays — meaningful observation and coherent argumentation score more than polished filler.
Here’s a tip: When you practice Describe Image, aim for 3 clear observations + 1 short implication — that beats 8 vague lines. Keep in mind human reviewers want substance.
Try it yourself — Free PTE Mock Test! Register on ExamsDojo.com and get a free full-length PTE mock test with instant AI feedback. Experience the new format and detailed section analysis exactly as students face after the August 2025 update.
For institutes & trainers — curriculum fixes
Overhaul Reading modules — add timed multi-question drills, Speed reading techniques specific to PTE formats and Cognitive load management strategies
Stop the Template Obsession —Usebalanced approach of Structure + Content development. Add live answer-generation drills and peer review.
Identify high-variability students early — use diagnostic tests to spot 25+ point gaps and personalise remedial plans.
Set realistic expectations — some students need 3–4 attempts to adapt fully; plan pipelines accordingly.
Tools & practice resources You might want to use skill-specific platforms and mock tests for focused practice (speaking prompts, timed reading sets, essay feedback). ExamsDojo-style diagnostics are useful for drilling weak subskills (vocabulary in reading, summarising accuracy in listening/speaking).
Pro Tips, Examples & Quick Wins
Pro Tip (Reading): practice “3-pass reading” — skim for topic, scan for keywords, then answer the question. Time yourself strictly.
Pro Tip (Speaking): treat templates as signposts: intro — 2 facts — implication — wrap. Add one unique observation to avoid templated phrasing.
Mini exercise: take any 3-minute group discussion audio, write a 2-minute spoken summary — record, transcribe, then check for 3 facts + one insight. Do 5 such drills per week.
FAQs
Q: Are templates dead? A: Not totally — they can be structural scaffolds. But pure memorised scripts will be flagged. Make content original.
Q: Which section should I fix first? A: Reading — because it’s the largest negative drag in these results. Then Writing and Listening; use Speaking strengths to boost confidence.
Conclusion & Call to Action
To sum up: post-August 2025 PTE changes shifted the exam towards content and originality. Our 50-student analysis shows Reading is the biggest pain area and needs serious attention, Speaking is surprisingly strong for many, and Listening/Writing are moderate and usage of templates have evolved. Data-driven prep beats rumours — so adjust study plans now.
Don’t worry — we’ve got you covered. If you’d like, share an anonymised snapshot of your recent score report (or your student’s) and I’ll point out the top 3 things to work on — quick and practical. Want that?
Related Reads for Serious PTE Test Takers
Want to dive deeper? Explore these expert-backed guides to stay ahead of every update and requirement.